Well, spring is in the air and that must mean you are reading the annual LASN “Parks” issue.
With that, here are a couple of things trending in the world of park development. Recently, the ASLA released a statement opposing the Trump Administration’s 2019 fiscal year budget proposal, because it “recommended cutting the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) by 98 percent from FY17 levels and zeroing out the state grants program.” This represents a potential $900 million savings for the gov’t, but a huge loss for park development across the country. Since a lot of the allocations are based on a given state’s population, this retreat in spending would affect states like California, New York and Illinois to a greater extent than other less populated states. While I am definitely for less government spending, this matter does warrant further review. To find out more you should visit:
From the NRPA (National Recreation and Parks Association), I recently read a very entertaining piece on park trends that offered several interesting predictions, including a trend to renovate underground and otherwise abandoned facilities (like Seattle’s Battery Street Tunnel) into park spaces. Old train stations, subways, rail tunnels and more are all in play when it comes to this trend.
Another interesting prediction was that puppy waste could become fuel through “small-scale anaerobic digesters for parks. Patrons could deposit dog waste, which is composted to produce methane that is used to power park lighting.” (See page 120 of LASN March 2018.)
And also from the NRPA is a more somber prediction. Lack of housing is forcing cities to look hard for available real estate. Some parks are being replaced with high-rise or other population-dense developments. The NRPA is predicting this trend to grow in 2018, but offered a potential deterrent to this by “dedicating” land as park land. Apparently in New York, approving a conversion from a dedicated park to a different kind of development requires a 2/3 majority in the legislature and the change must also “comply with federal protections of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act” if the original park was built with those funds. (Although if Trump’s proposed budget changes kick in, this point would be somewhat moot for future developed parks.) I’m sure every state is a bit different, but if you can officially dedicate the land as a park it has a better chance of withstanding the onslaught of developers.
So, it appears that developing a park will not always be a walk in the park, but keeping an eye on legislation and working the system will definitely help to park the park as a park . . .
God bless and happy Easter . . .
George Schmok, Publisher
As seen in LASN magazine, March 2018.